Wednesday, June 27, 2007
A wee piano break
Sunday, June 24, 2007
Oui, c'est Montréal

Sunday, June 17, 2007
Music for grumpiness
Friday, June 15, 2007
Reflections on taking lessons
Initially I signed up for lessons simply to be motivated. I am quite happy to sit in front of the TV unless pushed, so I thought that reporting to someone each week would help me spend more time at the piano (I don't like to disappoint or inconvenience people by arriving at a meeting or lesson unprepared). While I have achieved this goal, I have discovered that piano lessons are important for many more reasons. I have discovered how much I don't know! Obviously there is a lot I have forgotten, but you always learn different things from different teachers. Here are the benefits that stand out for me so far:
- hand position, arm position, body position and learning that it isn't all about the fingers. Much of our body movement is unconscious, so it's great to have someone pointing out things we are doing that make playing more difficult
- posture (related to body position) and staying relaxed. Peter often points out that I've raised and hunched up my shoulders, this kind of tension can be restrictive and probably can cause injury and also affect the sound. Interestingly, whenever I've had personal trainers at the gym they also have had to remind me to keep my shoulders down
- having someone point out wrong notes. This may seem obvious, but just like we can read a paragraph and overlook spelling mistakes and missing words because our mind fills in what we expect to be there, I sometimes read notes as I expect them to be written rather than what the composer has actually written! For example, I sometimes resolve a chord that shouldn't be resolved yet or I play a bass note wrong because for the past 8 bars the composer has been doing tonic and dominant and then throws in the 3rd. This can be ok for some genres, but most times the composer's chosen note is actually better than mine!
- help with fingering. There are so many options for piano fingering and each player has to find what works best, but an experienced teacher can spot when it is the fingering that's screwing you up
- different ways of practicing. When I am having difficulties with a piece, Peter can show me many different way of playing parts of the same passage so that I learn how that passage works. Sometimes this can be as simple of playing all of the chords but omitting the in-between notes.
- repertoire. It is nice to be introduced to new pieces that I may not have stumbled across on my own (even if it means that I had to go buy & new Haydn book because of course the sonata was not in the one I had!)
- what went wrong... Peter can figure out why I'm struggling with a certain thing which prevents a lot beating my head against the wall
- knowledge of grade levels/difficulty. Although Peter will push me to try things out (and abandon them if necessary, i.e. nasty, difficult, Beethoven sonata...), he has a good idea of what my ability is and will tell me if he thinks a piece is beyond that ability at the moment and choose another piece that will help improve my playing so that I may be able to tackle the piece in the future
I will post other benefits as I think of them, but now I should do the dishes before Cathy phones. We are planning our Montreal trip for next weekend (yay!)
Monday, June 11, 2007
Sight reading improvement
Thursday, June 7, 2007
Playing with cats

Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Time to listen
For Chopin Nocturnes no. 1 and 2 click here
For Mendelssohn (track 7 Op.30: En Mi Bemol Majeur) click here (not the best recording but...)
For The entertainer; Maple leaf rag; Pineapple rag / Scott Joplin click here (old and scratchy but you'll get the idea)
Monday, June 4, 2007
From my garden
Details, details... deceptively difficult
I started off calling the Chopin Nocturne op. 9 no. 2 my "easy Chopin" as compared to op. 9 no. 1. Indeed, it is rated as grade 8 by the RCM* whereas no. 1 is rated as grade 10. In terms of notes and rhythm etc. it is easier to play. However, I now believe it is not easier to play well. There are so many details which affect how nicely the piece sounds. For example, the left hand is a waltz-like pattern (although the piece is in 12/8 not 3/4) with bass note plus two chords in groups of 3. The tricky part is highlighting the bass note while making sure the next 2 chords are in the background. As the top chord inevitably has your thumb in it, this is harder than it sounds. The other problem I had was making sure my hand position changed with each chord, even if my fingers could stretch without that change, so that I maintained the centre of the chord and accordingly all notes sounded evenly. My next challenge was to not use the last chord as a launching off point to get my hand back down to the bass note which is quite a distance away, which I was doing quite unconsciously. Peter says I must lift my hand from that last chord and then move sideways, like one of those automation robots, rather than lift and move at the same time, otherwise the chord is too loud and interferes with the melody. Add to this the fact that the bass notes and accompanying chords change on every beat and you spend a lot of time concentrating on that left hand.
If you read this blog regularly, you will notice that problems with the left hand are frequent!
*RCM = Royal Conservatory of Music
Friday, June 1, 2007
"Very nice" says he, "Yay!" says me
I did play my Mendelssohn without interruption (triumph!) and received a "very nice!" from Peter (double triumph!). I don't know whether it is Peter's teaching style or whether he treats me differently because I'm an adult student, but the most I've gotten out of him in terms of compliments on my playing is "good job!" (for the Pineapple Rag) and "you're almost there!" (for the Nocturne, op. 9 no. 1). He's a great teacher but quite different from Joan! Very laid back! We're still getting used to each other. I'm not sure that he always gets my sense of humour...
